LibValue Database

Export 3796 results:
Author [ Keyword(Desc)] Title Type Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
Academic libraries
Brown D, Sen B.  2010.  The Undergraduate Prospectus as a Marketing Tool for Academic Libraries. New Review of Academic Librarianship. 16:160-191.
Dugan RE, Hernon P, Nitecki DA.  2009.  Viewing library metrics from different perspectives : inputs, outputs, and outcomes. :xv,346p..
Derven C, Kendlin V.  2011.  Evidence-Based Librarianship: A Case Study of a Print Resource Cancellation Project. Journal of Academic Librarianship. 37:166-170.
Baker G.  0.  University Investment in the Library, Phase II: An International Study of the Library's Value to the Grant Process. The Changing Face of Scientific Research & the Resources that Evolve to Support It..
Mount E, Fasana PJ.  1972.  An approach to the measurement of use and cost of a large academic research library system: a report of a study done at Columbia University Libraries. College & Research Libraries. 33:199-211.
Schad JG.  1979.  Missing the Brass Ring in the Iron City. Journal of Academic Librarianship. 5:60-1.
Hayes R M.  1992.  Measurement of Use and Resulting Access Allocation Decisions. Library & Information Science Research. 14:361-377.
Kinman V.  2009.  E-Metrics and Library Assessment in Action. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship. 21:15-36.
Tenopir C.  0.  Scholarly Reading in a Digital Age: Some things change, some stay the same. NFAIS.
Matthews JR.  2007.  Library assessment in higher education. :vii,146p..
Oakleaf M.  2009.  Using rubrics to assess information literacy: An examination of methodology and interrater reliability. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology. 60:969-983.
McMillen P, Deitering A-M.  2007.  Complex Questions, Evolving Answers -- Creating a Multidimensional Assessment Strategy to Build Support for the "Teaching Library". Public Services Quarterly. 3:57-82.
Grozanick SE.  2010.  The Impact Factor: Implications of Open Access on Quality. Public Services Quarterly. 6:389-399.
King DW, Tenopir C, Montgomery CH, Aerni SE.  2003.  Patterns of journal use by faculty at three diverse universities. D-Lib Magazine. 9
Quinn B.  2000.  The McDonaldization of academic libraries? College & Research Libraries. :248-261.
Bennett C, Bodnar J.  2010.  Academic Engagement in the Library Commons. Public Services Quarterly. 6:43-47;5p.
Leimkuhler FF.  1966.  Systems analysis in university libraries. College & Research Libraries. 27:13-18.
King DW, Aerni SE, Brody F, Herbison M, Knapp A.  2004.  The Use and Outcomes of University Library Print and Electronic Collections.
Thomas WJoseph, Blackwell L.  2010.  NIH Mandate One Year On: How Are Libraries Responding? Serials Librarian. 58:257-262.
Germano MA.  2010.  Narrative-based library marketing: Selling your library's value during tough economic times. Bottom Line: Managing Library Finances. 23:5-17.
Fraser BT, McClure CR, Leahy EH.  2002.  Toward a framework for assessing library and institutional outcomes. portal: Libraries and the Academy. 2:505-528.
Oakleaf M.  2010.  Writing Information Literacy Assessment Plans: A Guide to Best Practice. Communications in Information Literacy. 3:80.
Weiner S.  2005.  Library Quality and Impact: Is There a Relationship between New Measures and Traditional Measures? Journal of Academic Librarianship. 31:432-437.
Kimball R, Ives G, Jackson K.  2010.  Comparative Usage of Science E-book and Print Collections at Texas A&M University Libraries. Collection Management. 35:15-28.
Kaufman PT.  2008.  The Library as Strategic Investment: Results of the Illinois Return on Investment Study. Liber Quarterly: The Journal of European Research Libraries. 18:424-436.

Pages